4

The world around Napoleon Bonaparte “Bone” Latta: an 1849 counterfeit detector, a nineteenth-century image of Napoleon, Elizabeth Patterson Bonaparte, and Joseph Bonaparte’s Point Breeze estate in New Jersey. I have not found a publicly accessible portrait that I can confidently identify as Bone Latta himself, so I would rather show the documented world surrounding him than attach the wrong face to the story.

There is an odd name sitting near the center of one of the strangest counterfeiting stories in the nineteenth-century Midwest: Napoleon Bonaparte Latta.

He was generally known as “Bone” Latta, and the research that has reconstructed his career places him in a sprawling antebellum and Civil War-era counterfeiting world extending through the Michigan-Indiana border region and eventually into Monroe, Wisconsin. Independent researcher Andrea Nolen identifies Latta, born in 1827, as a leading figure in what became remembered locally as the Bonelatta Gang. Her work describes him as operating in counterfeit currency by at least the early 1850s and later using Monroe as an important base.

Counterfeiters with colorful nicknames are hardly unusual in American history. A counterfeiter whose actual given names were Napoleon Bonaparte, however, deserves a second look.

The interesting question is not whether the name proves that Latta belonged to some secret Bonaparte bloodline. It does not. The surviving evidence does not justify that conclusion. The interesting question is simpler and historically stronger: what did it mean for an American family to give a child the full name of Napoleon Bonaparte while the Bonaparte dynasty was still a living political force?

Once that question is asked, Bone Latta’s name stops looking like a joke and begins opening a door into a much larger American story.

Counterfeit Money in a Country Full of Money

The world Bone Latta entered was almost perfectly designed for counterfeiters.

Before the Civil War created a more standardized national monetary system, Americans lived with an astonishing variety of paper currency. State-chartered banks issued their own notes, and those notes could circulate hundreds of miles from the institution whose name appeared on them. A merchant in Indiana might be handed a note from a bank in New York that he had never seen and could not immediately verify.

That is why publications such as bank-note reporters and counterfeit detectors existed. They helped merchants determine which banks were legitimate, which notes were discounted, which institutions had failed, and which known counterfeits were circulating. An 1849 issue of Van Court’s Counterfeit Detector and Bank Note List, for example, warned readers about newly appearing fraudulent notes and described details that might reveal them.

The problem was not simply that clever criminals could reproduce money. The legitimate monetary system itself required enormous amounts of trust.

A bill did not have to fool everybody. It had to fool the next person.

The farther the paper moved from the bank whose name appeared on it, the more difficult verification became. Distance created uncertainty, and uncertainty created opportunity. The manuscript behind The Latta Connection describes this world as a commercial supply chain rather than a collection of isolated street criminals: engravers, paper suppliers, printers, finishers, distributors, merchants, horse traders, taverns, roads and trusted intermediaries all had potential roles.

Bone Latta belonged to that economy.

Nolen’s reconstruction describes the Latta counterfeiting operation as drawing heavily on bank notes associated with New York and Rhode Island while using Midwestern networks to move the paper. Her research places members of the Latta family around the Michigan-Indiana border before Bone established himself farther west in Wisconsin.

The important point is that counterfeiting followed transportation.

A good note sitting hidden in a room was only printed paper. It became money when somebody successfully moved it into circulation.

That makes Napoleon Bonaparte Latta’s criminal world part of a larger nineteenth-century story about roads, horses, rail lines, merchants and information. It also makes his name more intriguing, because Napoleon Bonaparte was hardly an obscure historical figure in the America into which Bone Latta was born.

Napoleon Was Not Ancient History

Bone Latta was born only six years after Napoleon Bonaparte died on Saint Helena.

When modern Americans hear “Napoleon,” the name can feel like ancient European history: paintings, bicorne hats, Waterloo and textbook maps. For a child born in 1827, Napoleon belonged to the immediate political past.

More importantly, the Bonapartes themselves were still present in American life.

Napoleon’s older brother Joseph Bonaparte had fled Europe after the collapse of the empire and settled in the United States. From 1816 onward he developed Point Breeze, his estate near Bordentown, New Jersey, into one of the most extraordinary private residences in the country. The National Gallery of Art’s history of the estate describes Joseph as residing largely in the United States between 1816 and 1839, eventually expanding Point Breeze to roughly 1,800 acres and creating elaborate gardens, roads, lakes and buildings there.

Point Breeze was no hidden exile cabin.

It became a social and cultural center where Joseph entertained American politicians, diplomats, artists, European émigrés and other elite visitors. The estate contained an important art collection and extensive library, and it sat strategically between Philadelphia and New York.

So when Napoleon Bonaparte Latta was born, one of Napoleon’s brothers was living openly and magnificently in New Jersey.

That alone changes the atmosphere around the name.

Baltimore Had Its Own Bonaparte Dynasty

The American Bonaparte connection went even deeper.

In 1803, Jérôme Bonaparte, Napoleon’s youngest brother, met and married eighteen-year-old Baltimore heiress Elizabeth Patterson, daughter of wealthy merchant William Patterson. The wedding took place in Baltimore on Christmas Eve. Napoleon opposed the marriage and ultimately refused to recognize it as a valid dynastic union, but Elizabeth gave birth to their son, Jérôme Napoleon Bonaparte, in 1805. The Maryland Center for History and Culture preserves a substantial collection of Elizabeth’s correspondence, legal papers, account books and other records from her long effort to defend her and her son’s position.

Elizabeth Patterson Bonaparte, Jérôme Bonaparte, and Point Breeze. Whatever else one makes of Bone Latta’s name, “Bonaparte” in nineteenth-century America referred to a living family with American property, American descendants and continuing transatlantic ambitions.

Elizabeth never treated her marriage as an embarrassing youthful adventure to be forgotten. She spent decades defending her place within the Bonaparte story and attempting to secure recognition for her son. Her papers include the legal and financial residue of that campaign, while Maryland collections preserve portraits and objects from what became a recognizable Patterson-Bonaparte family archive.

This matters because the Bonaparte name had become American in two different ways.

Joseph Bonaparte brought the exiled imperial court into New Jersey.

Elizabeth Patterson brought the Bonaparte dynasty into Baltimore family history.

Their descendants carried the name forward through the nineteenth century. Jerome Napoleon Bonaparte Jr., a grandson of Elizabeth and Jérôme, even graduated from West Point and served in both the United States Army and the army of Napoleon III’s Second French Empire.

So when an American family called a son “Napoleon Bonaparte” in 1827, the name did not point only to a dead emperor.

It pointed to a continuing world.

What Did Names Mean?

Nineteenth-century Americans frequently gave children names drawn from politics, military heroes, classical history, religion and famous public figures. Washingtons, Lafayettes, Jacksons, Jeffersons and Napoleons all appear in genealogical records.

That means Bone Latta’s name cannot be treated as proof of secret ancestry.

It could have reflected admiration. It could have been a political statement. It could have been family fashion. It could have commemorated somebody else already bearing the name. It could even have been chosen simply because Napoleon remained one of the most magnetic public figures of the age.

But the full construction “Napoleon Bonaparte Latta” is still worth preserving rather than sanding down into “Bone.”

The manuscript makes precisely that distinction. It treats the name as evidence that Bonaparte memory existed somewhere in the Latta family environment, while acknowledging that the surviving public record does not establish a biological Bonaparte connection.

That is the useful historical position.

The name is evidence.

The interpretation remains open.

Then Another Latta Started Collecting Napoleon

If Napoleon Bonaparte Latta were the only appearance of Napoleon inside the wider Latta story, the name could be filed away as an intriguing nineteenth-century curiosity.

It is not the only appearance.

Half a century later, William J. Latta of Philadelphia built an enormous collection devoted to Napoleon and the French Revolution.

William J. Latta was born in Chester County, Pennsylvania, in 1852. His father, William Sutton Latta, was associated with the Pennsylvania Railroad as a surgeon, and William J. began his own railroad career as a telegraph operator while still young. He rose through the Pennsylvania Railroad organization and eventually served in senior operating positions before retiring in 1899. His surviving family papers contain railroad passes, telegraph material, business correspondence, household records and extensive documentation from his life in Philadelphia.

And then there is the Napoleon collection.

The Anderson Galleries sale catalogue did not describe it modestly. Its title was The Unequalled Collection Relating to Napoleon and the French Revolution of William J. Latta of Philadelphia, Pa.

The first sale in April 1913 included prints, original drawings, autographs, books, medals, bronzes, snuff boxes and other objects. Additional portions followed. One surviving description of Part II lists more than 1,800 lots in that installment alone, including caricatures, original drawings, autographs, two gold boxes associated with Napoleon and Nelson’s lorgnette.

A contemporary Napoleonic bibliography went even further, describing Latta as possessing approximately 3,000 Napoleon caricatures and saying that his wider collection was reputed to be among the largest and finest of its kind.

This was not a man who happened to own a Napoleon bust.

He had constructed an archive.

The Winterthur-associated Latta family material preserved today includes catalogues from the sale and identifies William explicitly as an avid collector of Napoleoniana. His collection contained portraits, bronzes, letters, caricatures, memoirs and related historical material.

The manuscript treats this later William J. Latta collection as the hardest physical object in its Bonaparte question because it transforms the pattern from a single strange name into something more sustained. A boy called Napoleon Bonaparte could reflect a momentary naming fashion. A wealthy railroad man spending years assembling thousands of Napoleonic objects represents a very different kind of attention.

Still, the same caution applies.

There is no document presently establishing that Bone Latta and William J. Latta were preserving a secret family claim to Bonaparte ancestry.

There is, however, a documented recurrence of Napoleonic fascination around the Latta name.

That is worth investigating.

The Two Lattas Could Hardly Look More Different

The contrast between the two men is almost too good.

Bone Latta belongs to the shadow economy of the nineteenth-century interior: counterfeit bills, horse-country movement, small towns, weak verification, criminal contacts and the problem of making fraudulent paper circulate.

William J. Latta belongs to the respectable industrial world: telegraphy, the Pennsylvania Railroad, Philadelphia, collecting, cataloguing and the private preservation of European political history.

One deals in paper that is valuable because people mistake it for authentic.

The other collects paper and objects whose value depends upon proving authenticity.

That is the kind of structural recurrence that The Latta Connection keeps returning to. The book is less interested in declaring that every Latta belongs to one centralized conspiracy than in following the surname across places where provenance, documentation, movement and authority become unusually important.

The counterfeit note needs a convincing origin.

The railroad needs a schedule and bill of lading.

The pedigreed horse needs registration.

The limestone block needs a specification and shipping route.

The Napoleon autograph needs authentication.

Different industries keep producing the same question: who has the authority to say that this thing is what it claims to be?

That is a much more useful connection than forcing every person into the same family plot.

Bonaparte America Was Real Enough Without a Secret Dynasty

The most important thing to understand about the larger Bonaparte question is that there is already plenty of documented American history before speculation becomes necessary.

Joseph Bonaparte genuinely lived at Point Breeze.

Jérôme Bonaparte genuinely married Elizabeth Patterson in Baltimore.

Their American son genuinely continued the family.

Their descendants genuinely moved through military and elite American life.

Elizabeth genuinely spent decades contesting dynastic recognition.

American museums and archives genuinely preserve a Patterson-Bonaparte collection.

William J. Latta genuinely amassed thousands of objects relating to Napoleon and the French Revolution.

And a Midwestern counterfeiter genuinely went through life with the name Napoleon Bonaparte Latta.

Those facts do not need exaggeration.

They are already unusual.

What remains unresolved is why those lines seem to keep approaching one another.

The Name Survived the Emperor

Napoleon’s political empire collapsed in 1815, but his cultural and institutional afterlife was enormous. His family remained active. Napoleon III rebuilt an empire in France beginning in the 1850s. Collectors accumulated Napoleonic relics. Political admirers and enemies continued arguing over what Napoleon represented: order, dictatorship, meritocracy, militarism, revolution disciplined by administration, or some combination of all of them.

Bone Latta lived through exactly that period.

When he was a young adult, Napoleon III was rising to power in France. Joseph Bonaparte had only recently left the United States. Elizabeth Patterson Bonaparte was very much alive in Baltimore. The American Bonaparte family had not become genealogy yet.

It was contemporary society.

That does not tell us why his parents chose his name.

It tells us why the question is historically legitimate.

From Bone Latta to The Latta Connection

The easiest way to misunderstand The Latta Connection would be to reduce it to the claim that everyone with the surname Latta belonged to one secret family enterprise.

The book itself is more careful than that. Its central method is to separate what is documented from what is inferred and what remains speculative.

Napoleon Bonaparte Latta is therefore valuable precisely because he forces those categories to remain separate.

His existence is documented within the Monroe counterfeiting research.

His unusual name is real.

The nineteenth-century American Bonaparte world is real.

William J. Latta’s enormous Napoleon collection is real.

A concealed Bonaparte-Latta bloodline is not presently proven.

The fascinating part is the space between those facts.

That space contains counterfeit money moving through Midwestern roads, a French king living beside the Delaware, a Baltimore heiress fighting Napoleon’s dynasty, railroad executives preserving imperial artifacts, and a surname that keeps reappearing around systems built to move and authenticate value.

That is where the book begins asking larger questions.

The Latta Connection on Amazon

Bone Latta’s name does not solve the mystery.

It creates it.

And more than a century later, when another Latta’s thousands of Napoleonic objects went onto the auction block in New York, the mystery had still not entirely disappeared.